Man, I couldn’t have planned this any better with the last post “Abortion and Slavery are the Same.” There is no denying that anytime a liberal says, “Health Care Reform” they will always include the lessening of laws against a Woman’s choice to kill her child. This would include late term abortions, abortions for mothers under the age of 18 without a parents consent or knowledge, and failed abortions that result in allowing the doctor and Mother to choose to either let the baby live or die.

Obama, today nominated Kathleen Sebelius for HHS Secretary. There is no surprise that Sebelius is a proponent (through her voting) of late term abortions and parental consent. Why is it that Obama feels the need to control the deaths of innocent children in this country?

I have a few Questions:

Obama seems to believe that children need to be protected but desires that children have the responsibility and power to destroy other children.  I must be missing something here so if you know where I am wrong them please let me know.

Consider the fact that Sebelius is a proponent of late term abortions and Obama’s desire to resind Bush’s “administration rule that strengthened job protections for doctors and nurses who refuse for moral reasons to perform abortions.”  Why does Obama want to force Doctors and nurses to work against their will and conscience? Why is it that he intends for Mothers, mothers as children and Doctors to have the power to kill children even if they are already out of the womb from failed abortions?

Here are a few things that I just thought about:

• Obama wants all health records to be centralized.
• Obama wants children to have the power to determine the value of children through abortion but not have the power to decide to not be dependents of their parents.
• If a child  goes to the  clinic and finds herself pregnant then the Federal Government (Mr. and Mrs Obama Sebelius) would know this.  Since the child would not be required to notify the parents or  have parental involvement then the doctors would serve as the parent.
• If the Doctor or Federal Government (Mr. and Mrs Obama Sebelius) determined that it was appropriate for the child to have an abortion then the doctor would advise “in the doctor’s professional opinion” that it was good and necessary for the child to have the abortion.
• If the Federal Government (Mr. and Mrs Obama Sebelius) determined that the abortion was necessary but the Doctor did not then is the Doctor obligated to perform the abortion?
• If the Doctor determined that the abortion was necessary but thought that the parents would disagree then what would stop the doctor from convincing the child that the parents should not be involved? Because we all know that, “parents just don’t understand.”

From the HHS website:

THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) is the United States government’s principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans and providing essential human services, especially for those who are least able to help themselves.

I don’t think that allowing children to have abortions without parental consent or envolvement “protects anyone’s health, is essential to humanity and sense babys cannot help themselves then I don’t think they are helped either.

What Say You Concerning This?